May
19
Dreamgirls (USA, 2006, Bill Condon) and Blood Diamond (USA, 2006, Ed Zwick) are given the old one-two one-two, snicker-snack, and then we all go galumphing back.
Why do we bother? Because they are there.
Ben Begins:
I am postponing the cooking of supper to be followed by the watching of... Dreamgirls... sigh; goddamn wife hit the video store. She also brought home Blood Diamond, about which I am considerably more enthusiastic. Seen it?
And Dan:
I've seen them both. Dreamgirls is awful, terrible shite. Worse than TV movie of the weak (pun intended). Enjoy. At least Blood Diamond is a step up from the movie of the week fare. Not a great film, with too much emphasis on action (and on the Europeans), not enough on ideas (or the way this all affects Africans).
Why do we bother? Because they are there.
Ben Begins:
I am postponing the cooking of supper to be followed by the watching of... Dreamgirls... sigh; goddamn wife hit the video store. She also brought home Blood Diamond, about which I am considerably more enthusiastic. Seen it?
And Dan:
I've seen them both. Dreamgirls is awful, terrible shite. Worse than TV movie of the weak (pun intended). Enjoy. At least Blood Diamond is a step up from the movie of the week fare. Not a great film, with too much emphasis on action (and on the Europeans), not enough on ideas (or the way this all affects Africans).